Some people say that there are many women in a man's heart, but there is only one woman in a man's heart, and no matter how excellent a woman he meets in the future, he will not change his view.
Men may not necessarily have many women in their hearts, because men (I mean the majority of normal men) seem to be inferior to women in their attachment to emotions on the surface, but they are actually higher than women. They will not easily divide emotions into several parts at any time, to drift away from the drama of emotions, so there will not be many women in men's hearts, This sentence should be comprehensive and accurate if the word "if" is added before it.
There is only one woman in a man's heart, and he will never change his view no matter how excellent a woman he meets in the future. I think this sentence should be said as follows: If a man has a woman in his heart that he loves, even the most excellent woman will never break into his emotions again. "Once the woman whom this man loves is lost, this man will no longer have love, nor will he be able to socialize and live with any woman with love.".
On the other hand, once a man finds that the woman he loves is gone, unless he meets and can take himself again and place the woman in his heart, love will come to him again, and love will awaken the man again, and beauty will once again become the theme of his life.
We are talking about the difference between the bottom of the heart and the heart. In the heart, there are thoughts, thoughts, care, care, love, and so on. There is love, memories, thoughts, deep emotional precipitation, and so on in the heart.
Whether it is the bottom of the heart or the heart, it is the truth of the possession of emotions, and it is not the heart that is a kind of nihility. Because nihility is a cruel emotion, which is not acceptable to us people, I believe that emotion is the existence and precipitation in the bottom of the heart. This is a form and two stages. If we separate these feelings and talk about them, it is really a kind of desecration of emotions, which is not advisable. If it is a hypothetical form of metaphor, it can be regarded as an image of text.
The above is my view on our initial question. Let's talk about how many women there are in a man's heart. Actually, I don't need to say anything more. After reading my above analysis and interpretation of that sentence, everyone will also come to the answer to this question.
Men are the half of humanity, that is, the half of human cognition and thought, and there is no fundamental similarity with any woman, because men's rationality is fundamental, and women's sensibility is the foundation, which is the fundamental difference between men's and women's ideological understanding.
Therefore, the morality of men is what women need, which is where the stability of society lies. If the moral standard of men is that an individual's interests are not suitable for the fundamental overall interests of people, then it is terrible to lose the source of human development.
Morality is the norm of human behavior, not an dispensable dogma. The uniqueness of emotions and the monopolization of emotions is an eternal standard of morality, and there is no principle that can be replaced.
In fact, there is only one woman in a man's heart, whether in the bottom of his heart or in his heart, that is, the woman he will always love, the woman who will share his hardships, and the spiritual pillar that will enable him to enjoy his life. This is the cry of the man's heart and the bottom of his heart.