Post Date November, 17 2024
All men and women who live a clear life know that there is actually only one criterion for judging sexual health: whether they can guarantee that their sexual life is beautiful and happy. This standard is definitely individual, tailored to local conditions, and varies with the times. If we have to establish a framework of 'letting it be universally applicable at any time', then there is no need for these so-called sexologists now to read the Bible or the Analects.
Besides, is it "sexual health" that just staring at me is useless? I have to see what my Sexual partner is like. To put it extremely: if my wife is absolutely 'frigid', then my impotence is health. On the contrary, if my husband abstains, then if I have sexual desire, it means I am sick. Ultimately, unless it's masturbation, sex can only exist in a certain 'relationship'. If we break away from "relationships" and talk about "sexual health" and define it as "one's own" or "one's own", it is completely a word game or something else.
Also, sex is only a part of life, not the whole thing. For the sake of more valuable aspects of life, each of us often has to pay certain costs and choose what we should sacrifice. Sex cannot escape this' misfortune '. In extreme terms, can we harm or even lose what we cherish the most in pursuit of the "sexual health" imposed on us by others? Therefore, if sexual health is not considered in the overall picture of life, it can only be nonsense.
So, why do these so-called international sexologists still go against common sense to do so? To put it superficially, it's because they don't understand how sexuality has developed to this day, nor do they understand any knowledge beyond biology. Deeply speaking, that's because they are actually imposing their own values on the people of the world in an attempt to make money.
Fortunately, we Chinese people have become accustomed to hardship, so we have lived a clearer life; Because our survey results can prove all the analysis made by the author earlier.
We investigated everyone's frequency of wanting to have sex and masturbation, as well as men's intensity of "sexual interest", early morning erection, "desire but not lifting", "lifting soon", premature orgasm, lack of orgasm, lack of happiness, and worry about self-expression. For women, we added two items: Dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, and then deleted the items that are not suitable for women. There are 6 items in total. Then we rate everyone based on a percentage system (the higher the score, the fewer problems); So we can analyze it.
Sexual health varies from person to person
From an age perspective, males tend to score lower as they age. Men aged 20 to 24 score 57.9 points, while those aged 55 to 59 only score 41.7 points, a difference of as much as 17 points. But among women, it's a different story: the women who score the highest are those between 40 and 44 years old. No matter how old or young they are, their scores will be lower, and they can also differ by as much as 17 points.
This situation reminds us of at least three points:
Firstly, from the perspective of publicity and education, men's "sexual health" must be classified according to age, and the standards of young people must not be used to deceive the elderly, and the "decline" of elderly men must not be regarded as unhealthy. Otherwise, it is equivalent to encouraging the elderly to show off their abilities. What is the benefit?
Secondly, academically speaking, men inevitably become healthier as they age. If we must artificially set a framework for "sexual health" according to the appearance of young people, it is equivalent to discovering a "nonsense like truth" If people get older and healthier, will they still die?
Thirdly, we still cannot categorize 'sexual health' by age, as women are completely different from men. If we take the phenomenon of "Yin Sheng" in middle-aged women as the standard, it is equivalent to saying that the younger women are, the less healthy they are. If the performance of young people is regarded as "sexual health" in turn, then middle-aged women can only be "deviant" or even "abnormal".
